City of New York v. Caulwal Construction Co.
235 A.D. 682
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Kapper, J., dissent on the ground that a permit to do an illegal act does not give rise to any vested right.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of New York v. Caulwal Construction Co., 235 A.D. 682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
235 A.D. 682 (City of New York v. Caulwal Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
De Marco v. Fitzgerald
20 Misc. 2d 457 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Robitzek Investing Co. v. Colonial Beacon Oil Co.
265 A.D. 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)