City of New York v. Bullock
164 Misc. 2d 1052, 630 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 397
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons [1053]*1053stated in the opinion of Judge Diana Johnson (see, City of New York v Bullock, 159 Misc 2d 716).
Kassoff, P. J., Chetta and Patterson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of New York v. Bullock, 164 Misc. 2d 1052, 630 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 397 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).
164 Misc. 2d 1052 (City of New York v. Bullock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kew Gardens Portfolio Holdings, LLC v. Bucheli
69 Misc. 3d 129(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Lilley v. Molina
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019
Henry & Baltic Associates v. K & Q Food Corp.
7 Misc. 3d 83 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)