City of New York v. 60 W. 119 Corp.

465 N.E.2d 1267, 62 N.Y.2d 799, 477 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 9012
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 17, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, this court’s decision and order of February 28, 1984 are vacated and the following substituted therefor: “Motion for leave to appeal, pursuant to CPLR 5602 (subd [a], par 1, cl [ii]) dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements, upon the ground that defendants have an appeal pending in the Appellate Division from the judgment here sought to be appealed (see Parker v Rogerson, 35 NY2d 751), and upon the further ground that defendants’ motion for leave to appeal is untimely because the prior motion for leave to appeal addressed to the Appellate Division was not made within 30 days after service with notice of entry of the judgment sought to be appealed.” [See 61 NY2d 900.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of New York v. 60 W. 119 Corp., 465 N.E.2d 1267, 62 N.Y.2d 799, 477 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 9012 (N.Y. 1984).

465 N.E.2d 1267 (City of New York v. 60 W. 119 Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parillo v. Salvador
276 A.D.2d 1000 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Grasso v. Mathew
187 A.D.2d 758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)