City of New York Office of Labor Relations v. Comptroller of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City of New York Office of Labor Relations v. Comptroller of New York

253 A.D.2d 596, 677 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9391

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 10, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 253 A.D.2d 596 (City of New York Office of Labor Relations v. Comptroller of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of New York Office of Labor Relations v. Comptroller of New York, 253 A.D.2d 596, 677 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9391 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of respondent Comptroller of the City of New York, dated April 1, 1998, establishing the prevailing rate of wages for the title “Supervisor of Mechanics (Mechanical Equipment)”, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought originally in this Court pursuant to Labor Law § 220 dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the Comptroller’s finding, made after a thorough investigation of the relevant trades and occupations, that the private sector title “Master Mechanics (Mechanical Engineers)”, rather than “Foreman of Mechanics”, [597]*597is in the “ ‘same trade or occupation’ ” as the public sector title in question (Matter of Kelly v Beame, 15 NY2d 103, 109). Concur — Lerner, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Nardelli and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of respondent Comptroller of the City of New York, dated April 1, 1998, establishing the prevailing rate of wages for the title “Supervisor of Mechanics (Mechanical Equipment)”, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought originally in this Court pursuant to Labor Law § 220 dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports the Comptroller’s finding, made after a thorough investigation of the relevant trades and occupations, that the private sector title “Master Mechanics (Mechanical Engineers)”, rather than “Foreman of Mechanics”, [597]*597is in the “ ‘same trade or occupation’ ” as the public sector title in question (Matter of Kelly v Beame, 15 NY2d 103, 109). Concur — Lerner, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Nardelli and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 596, 677 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-york-office-of-labor-relations-v-comptroller-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack