City of New Whatcom v. Bellingham Bay Improvement Co.

Washington Supreme Court

City of New Whatcom v. Bellingham Bay Improvement Co.

47 P. 1102, 16 Wash. 138, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 23

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 8, 1896

DocketNo 2358

StatusPublished

This text of 47 P. 1102 (City of New Whatcom v. Bellingham Bay Improvement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of New Whatcom v. Bellingham Bay Improvement Co., 47 P. 1102, 16 Wash. 138, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 23 (Wash. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action is similar to another case between the same parties, just decided, ante, p. 131 with the exception that the defendant sought to offset a claim for lumber furnished the contractors in making the improvements, and its defense was stricken from the answer. The contractors were not parties to the proceeding. The warrants for the improvement were outstanding, and the defense was not available in an action by the city to foreclose the assessment liens.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This action is similar to another case between the same parties, just decided, ante, p. 131 with the exception that the defendant sought to offset a claim for lumber furnished the contractors in making the improvements, and its defense was stricken from the answer. The contractors were not parties to the proceeding. The warrants for the improvement were outstanding, and the defense was not available in an action by the city to foreclose the assessment liens.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 P. 1102, 16 Wash. 138, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-whatcom-v-bellingham-bay-improvement-co-wash-1896.