City of New Whatcom v. Bellingham Bay & British Columbia Railroad
This text of 47 P. 237 (City of New Whatcom v. Bellingham Bay & British Columbia Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts presented in this case are similar to those in the cases between the city and the Bellingham Bay Improvement Company, recently decided, ante p. 131 with the exception that the defendant contends that a railroad track cannot be assessed for benefits in making street improvements; and a number of authorities have been cited upon this proposition by both parties. But the statute upon which this proceeding was had provides, that all property benefited by the improvement shall be assessed to the extent of its proportionate part of the expense thereof. Laws, 1893, p. 227, §§ 1 and 2.
It is not within our province to say that a railroad track and right of way cannot be benefited under any circumstances by the construction of street improvements; and as it may have been benefited in this in[138]*138stance and the defendant did not appear and object to the assessment, we think the judgment should be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 P. 237, 16 Wash. 137, 1896 Wash. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-whatcom-v-bellingham-bay-british-columbia-railroad-wash-1896.