City of New Rochelle v. New Rochelle Coal & Lumber Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

City of New Rochelle v. New Rochelle Coal & Lumber Co.

173 A.D. 952, 158 N.Y.S. 1111

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 173 A.D. 952 (City of New Rochelle v. New Rochelle Coal & Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of New Rochelle v. New Rochelle Coal & Lumber Co., 173 A.D. 952, 158 N.Y.S. 1111 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Mills at Special Term. (Reported in 88 Mise. Rep. 194.) Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., dissented on the ground that the locus in quo had not been traveled or used as a highway for more than six years before the commencement of the action, and that under the Highway Law, section 334,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Mills at Special Term. (Reported in 88 Mise. Rep. 194.) Stapleton, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., dissented on the ground that the locus in quo had not been traveled or used as a highway for more than six years before the commencement of the action, and that under the Highway Law, section 334,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 A.D. 952, 158 N.Y.S. 1111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-rochelle-v-new-rochelle-coal-lumber-co-nyappdiv-1916.