City of New Rochelle v. Closter
This text of 269 A.D. 1053 (City of New Rochelle v. Closter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action brought pursuant to title 3 of article VII-A of the Tax Law to foreclose taxes against real property. Order of the County Court, Westchester County, as resettled, granting motion of plaintiff for summary judgment and the amended judgment entered in accordance therewith, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The failure of the collecting officer to file a list of delinquent taxes, including the parcel in suit, within three months after the adoption of a resolution electing to adopt title 3, does not affect the validity of this proceeding., The provision as to time in subdivision (1) of section 165-a of the Tax Law is merely directory and the statute by express language pro[1054]*1054vides for the inclusion of real property incumbered by unpaid tax liens for a period of more than four years in a list to be filed on the first day of May in each year. The filing of a list on May 1, 1941, including the parcel in suit on which, admittedly, tax liens had been unpaid for more than four years, was an act of the collecting officer within the purview of the statute. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 1053, 58 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-rochelle-v-closter-nyappdiv-1945.