City of New Richland v. VanEngelenburg
This text of 543 N.W.2d 634 (City of New Richland v. VanEngelenburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the flies, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the court of appeals filed October 24, 1995, answering a question certified by the district court as important and doubtful is affirmed. The district court granted VanEn-gelenburg’s motion to dismiss the criminal prosecution on double jeopardy grounds but certified the double jeopardy question to the court of appeals. The court of appeals answered the question in the negative and reversed the order dismissing the prosecution. VanEngelenburg’s double jeopardy argument is answered by our decision in State v. Hanson, 543 N.W.2d 84 (Minn.1996). The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
543 N.W.2d 634, 1996 Minn. LEXIS 57, 1996 WL 50918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-richland-v-vanengelenburg-minn-1996.