City of New Orleans v. Poulet

Supreme Court of Louisiana

City of New Orleans v. Poulet

99 So. 394, 155 La. 435, 1923 La. LEXIS 1705

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 3, 1923

DocketNo. 26254

StatusPublished

This text of 99 So. 394 (City of New Orleans v. Poulet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of New Orleans v. Poulet, 99 So. 394, 155 La. 435, 1923 La. LEXIS 1705 (La. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

ROGERS, J.

In each of the cases herein consolidated for the purposes of appeal, the issue presented is the same as in the case of J. Ernst (No. 26198), ante, p. 426, 99 South. 391, this day decided.

Each of the defendants was found guilty of operating a dairy without a permit, in violation of Ordinance No. 16204, Council Series, as amended by Ordinance No. 5649, New Council Series, of the commission council of the city of New Orleans, and duly sentenced.

For the reasons assigned in the case of the City of New Orleans v. J. Ernst (No. 26198), it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the conviction and sentence of the defendant in each of the consolidated cases be set aside, that the affidavit be quashed, and the defendant be discharged without day.

Rehearing refused by Division O, composed of OVERTON, ST. PAUL, and THOMPSON, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI