City of New Orleans v. Poulet

99 So. 394, 155 La. 435, 1923 La. LEXIS 1705
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 3, 1923·No. No. 26254·Published

Opinion

ROGERS, J.

In each of the cases herein consolidated for the purposes of appeal, the issue presented is the same as in the case of J. Ernst (No. 26198), ante, p. 426, 99 South. 391, this day decided.

Each of the defendants was found guilty of operating a dairy without a permit, in violation of Ordinance No. 16204, Council Series, as amended by Ordinance No. 5649, New Council Series, of the commission council of the city of New Orleans, and duly sentenced.

For the reasons assigned in the case of the City of New Orleans v. J. Ernst (No. 26198), it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the conviction and sentence of the defendant in each of the consolidated cases be set aside, that the affidavit be quashed, and the defendant be discharged without day.

Rehearing refused by Division O, composed of OVERTON, ST. PAUL, and THOMPSON, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of New Orleans v. Poulet, 99 So. 394, 155 La. 435, 1923 La. LEXIS 1705 (La. 1923).

99 So. 394 (City of New Orleans v. Poulet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of New Orleans v. Ernst
99 So. 391 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1923)