City of New Orleans v. Postek

Supreme Court of Louisiana

City of New Orleans v. Postek

158 So. 625, 181 La. 72, 1935 La. LEXIS 1461

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of New Orleans v. Postek. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 La. 1048 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 7, 1935·No. No. 33025.·Published

Opinion

BRUNOT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence for distributing circulars without *74 a permit, in violation of Ordinance No. 8080, O. C. S., of the city of New Orleans.

The same proceedings, including the filing of the demurrer, and the failure of counsel to have the same submitted to the court, from the inception of the trial to the entry of the order of appeal, were had in this case as were had in City of New Orleans v. Charles Ford, 181 La. 70, 158 So. 624, this day decided.

Therefore, for the reasons assigned in said case, the appeal herein is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRUNOT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence for distributing circulars without *74 a permit, in violation of Ordinance No. 8080, O. C. S., of the city of New Orleans.

The same proceedings, including the filing of the demurrer, and the failure of counsel to have the same submitted to the court, from the inception of the trial to the entry of the order of appeal, were had in this case as were had in City of New Orleans v. Charles Ford, 181 La. 70, 158 So. 624, this day decided.

Therefore, for the reasons assigned in said case, the appeal herein is dismissed.

City of New Orleans v. Postek, 158 So. 625, 181 La. 72, 1935 La. LEXIS 1461 (La. 1935).

Pincite

158 So. 625 (City of New Orleans v. Postek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related