City of New Orleans v. Morgan

35 So. 951, 111 La. 851, 1904 La. LEXIS 570
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJanuary 4, 1904
DocketNo. 15,014
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 35 So. 951 (City of New Orleans v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of New Orleans v. Morgan, 35 So. 951, 111 La. 851, 1904 La. LEXIS 570 (La. 1904).

Opinion

MONROE, J.

This is a proceeding by the city of New Orleans to expropriate, for the purposes of a water purification and pumping plant, two squares of ground, in the Seventh District, near the upper protection levee, designated by the numbers “301” and “330.” When the suit was instituted, the title stood in the name of Allan Lee Morgan, but he thereafter retransferred it to his mother, Mrs. Martha Morgan, who filed an answer denying the allegations of the petition, and averring that the property is worth $10,000. The jury assessed it at $4,200, and from a judgment predicated upon a verdict for that amount the city has appealed. The property in question is unimproved, save for a little wire fencing and a dilapidated wooden shanty of one room, which are of but little value. Squares 271 and 272 have recently been bought for $2,000 each, and square 292 has been offered at the same price, and they are thought to be more valuable than those of the defendant, because nearer to the car line on Carrollton avenue and to the more thickly inhabited part of the city. Upon the other hand, the squares 301 and 330 are higher than those of the defendant, and for that reason are better adapted to and more valuable for truck gardening, to which use they have in the past been devoted.

Upon the whole, in view of the conflicting testimony with which we are confronted, and although we are inclined to think that the amount allowed is possibly over liberal, we do not feel justified in disturbing the judgment appealed from, based, as it is, upon the verdict of a jury composed of persons selected because of their presumed peculiar knowledge of the subject.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hazell MacHine Co. v. Shahan
161 So. 2d 618 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1964)
Stringer v. Consumers Credit Corp.
105 So. 2d 756 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1958)
Gulf M. N.R. Co. v. Madden
200 So. 119 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1941)
Aetna Ins. Co. v. Commander
153 So. 877 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1934)
Hall v. Stokely
126 So. 475 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1930)
Texas Pacific-Missouri Pacific Terminal R. R. v. Rouprich
8 La. App. 181 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1928)
Aven v. Singleton
96 So. 165 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1923)
Home Insurance v. Tate Mercantile Co.
78 So. 709 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1918)
City of Shreveport v. Noel
38 So. 137 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 So. 951, 111 La. 851, 1904 La. LEXIS 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-orleans-v-morgan-la-1904.