City of New Orleans v. Martin

257 So. 2d 152, 260 La. 691, 1972 La. LEXIS 5674
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 8, 1972
DocketNo. 52140
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 257 So. 2d 152 (City of New Orleans v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of New Orleans v. Martin, 257 So. 2d 152, 260 La. 691, 1972 La. LEXIS 5674 (La. 1972).

Opinion

In re: Yvonne Martin applying for writs of review, certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ refused. The judgment of the lower court is correct.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

The ordinance appears unconstitutional on its face being over-broad in scope, ambiguous, and inconsistent and violative of First Amendment U.S. Const. See Coates v. City of Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611, 91 S.Ct. 1686, 29 L.Ed.2d 214 (1971).

TATE, J., concurs in Barham, J.’s, dissent.

See also Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 91 S.Ct. 1780, 29 L.Ed.2d 284 (1971).

DIXON, J., dissents from the refusal to grant writs,

See City of New Orleans v. Lewis, 257 La. 993, 244 So.2d 860.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of New Orleans v. Martin
292 So. 2d 193 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1974)
City of New Orleans v. Lewis
269 So. 2d 450 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 So. 2d 152, 260 La. 691, 1972 La. LEXIS 5674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-orleans-v-martin-la-1972.