City of New Orleans v. Martin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

City of New Orleans v. Martin

257 So. 2d 152, 260 La. 691, 1972 La. LEXIS 5674

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 8, 1972·No. No. 52140·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In re: Yvonne Martin applying for writs of review, certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ refused. The judgment of the lower court is correct.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

The ordinance appears unconstitutional on its face being over-broad in scope, ambiguous, and inconsistent and violative of First Amendment U.S. Const. See Coates v. City of Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611, 91 S.Ct. 1686, 29 L.Ed.2d 214 (1971).

TATE, J., concurs in Barham, J.’s, dissent.

See also Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 91 S.Ct. 1780, 29 L.Ed.2d 284 (1971).

DIXON, J., dissents from the refusal to grant writs,

See City of New Orleans v. Lewis, 257 La. 993, 244 So.2d 860.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Yvonne Martin applying for writs of review, certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ refused. The judgment of the lower court is correct.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

The ordinance appears unconstitutional on its face being over-broad in scope, ambiguous, and inconsistent and violative of First Amendment U.S. Const. See Coates v. City of Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611, 91 S.Ct. 1686, 29 L.Ed.2d 214 (1971).

TATE, J., concurs in Barham, J.’s, dissent.

See also Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 91 S.Ct. 1780, 29 L.Ed.2d 284 (1971).

DIXON, J., dissents from the refusal to grant writs,

See City of New Orleans v. Lewis, 257 La. 993, 244 So.2d 860.

City of New Orleans v. Martin, 257 So. 2d 152, 260 La. 691, 1972 La. LEXIS 5674 (La. 1972).

Pincite

257 So. 2d 152 (City of New Orleans v. Martin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related