City of New Orleans v. Martin
This text of 257 So. 2d 152 (City of New Orleans v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re: Yvonne Martin applying for writs of review, certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.
Writ refused. The judgment of the lower court is correct.
The ordinance appears unconstitutional on its face being over-broad in scope, ambiguous, and inconsistent and violative of First Amendment U.S. Const. See Coates v. City of Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611, 91 S.Ct. 1686, 29 L.Ed.2d 214 (1971).
See also Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 91 S.Ct. 1780, 29 L.Ed.2d 284 (1971).
See City of New Orleans v. Lewis, 257 La. 993, 244 So.2d 860.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 So. 2d 152, 260 La. 691, 1972 La. LEXIS 5674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-orleans-v-martin-la-1972.