City of New Orleans v. Lacroix
This text of 11 La. Ann. 193 (City of New Orleans v. Lacroix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case comes up on a bill of exceptions to the ruling of the court below. The Judge refused to receive evidence that the property described in the demand and assessment rolls, had been alienated by the defendant previous to the assessment.
Under the pleadings, the court did not err. The answer, after setting up various dilatory exceptions, merely stated that, should the exceptions be overruled, “ the respondent pleads a general denial, and especially the ownership of the property taxed.”
Such a vague and loose averment as this, did not authorize the admission of the evidence proposed. The defendant should have alleged specifically what were the errors he complained of in the assessment roll, and that he had, without avail, resorted to the means afforded him by law to correct such errors, or at least, allege a sufficient reason for having failed to do so.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 La. Ann. 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-orleans-v-lacroix-la-1856.