City of New Orleans v. Hollis

Supreme Court of Louisiana

City of New Orleans v. Hollis

323 So. 2d 139, 1975 La. LEXIS 4728

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of New Orleans v. Hollis. Read the opinion of the Court — 1976 La. LEXIS 3888 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 2, 1975·No. No. 57132·Published

Opinion

In re: Glendora Hollis, applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and stay order.

Granted. (See Order)

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Rudolph Becker, III Judge of the Criminal District, Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 19th day of December, 1975, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

[140]*140It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 27th day of February, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Glendora Hollis, applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and stay order.

Granted. (See Order)

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Rudolph Becker, III Judge of the Criminal District, Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 19th day of December, 1975, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

[140]*140It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 27th day of February, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

City of New Orleans v. Hollis, 323 So. 2d 139, 1975 La. LEXIS 4728 (La. 1975).

Pincite

323 So. 2d 139 (City of New Orleans v. Hollis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.