City of New Orleans v. Heirs of de St. Romes

28 La. Ann. 17
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 15, 1876·No. No. 5291·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Wyly, J.

The city of New Orleans, after the usual publication of notice to delinquent taxpayers, confirmed in the Superior District Court a default against the heirs of de St. Romes, and rendered judgment for $540 for taxes due the city for the year 1871.

[18]*18From this judgment Eugene de St Romes, Victor de St. Romes, and ."Emtance de St. Romes have appealed.

In- this court appellants have filed an assignment of errors, the most Important objection being, the notice published did not mention their mames; it only designated defendants as “Heirs of de St. Romes.”

The advertisement, under the statute, has the effect of a citation duly .served, and it should be subject to the same rules as the citation of which it is the equivalent. City of New Orleans vs. Heirs of Schmidt, 10 An. 771. Notice published to the Heirs of de St. Romes ” was not a 'legal citation to Eugene, Victor, and Ermance de St. Romes, the appellants. It was too indefinite to amount to a citation to any one. The •judgment must therefore be reversed.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment herein be set aside and .annulled at the costs of appellee.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of New Orleans v. Heirs of de St. Romes, 28 La. Ann. 17 (La. 1876).

28 La. Ann. 17 (City of New Orleans v. Heirs of de St. Romes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Louisiana Land Co. v. Blakewood
59 So. 984 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1912)
In re the State
23 N.W. 189 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1885)