City of New Orleans v. Gray Line Motor Tours, Inc.
This text of 317 So. 2d 214 (City of New Orleans v. Gray Line Motor Tours, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The New Orleans Aviation Board (Board)1 is an unattached board of the executive branch of the City of New Orleans. On August 10, 1972 the Board unanimously approved a resolution “ * * * establishing the payment of 15% of gross receipts to the Board, effective July 11, 1972, for the following types of non-contractual ground transportation activities to and from the New Orleans International Airport (Airport):
1. Limousine service to airport only
2. Prearranged or reserved limousine pickups at the airport
3. Charter busses to and from the airport.”
Pursuant to this resolution the Board demanded payment of defendants who are engaged in non-contractual ground transportation activities to and from the Airport. Defendants failed to make payment and this suit was filed. Defendants filed an exception of no cause of action. They argued that plaintiffs’ petition failed to allege affirmatively the approval by the City Council of the Board’s resolution of August 10, 1973 as required by the Louisiana Constitution of 1921, Article 14, Section 31.6(D).2 Plaintiffs conceded that specific [216]*216approval of the City Council was not sought nor has the Council taken any action on the resolution. The district court sustained defendants’ exception. We affirm.
Plaintiffs argue that the required approval of the City Council is contained in the M.C.S. Ordinance No. 680, Sections 1, 2, and 7,3 adopted on April 19, 1956, which remains unaffected by Article 14, Section 31.6(D) because of the provisions of Article 14, Section 31.6(1) 4 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1921.
The functions of New Orleans Aviation Board are to:
“(1) Administer, operate and maintain all municipal airports and aviation facilities.
“(2) Represent the City in all technical ' matters pertaining to aeronautics in consultation with state, national or international aeronautics officers or agencies.” Home Rule Charter of the City of New Orleans, 1954, Chapter 7, Section 5-702.
Apparently, M.C.S. Ordinance No. 680, Sections 1 and 2 (Code of the City of New Orleans, Sections 4-12.1 and 4 — 12.2 were adopted to supplement the various statutes, ordinances, and the Home Rule Charter, under all of which the Board is charged with the “administration, operation and- maintenance” of the Airport.5 This ordinance empowers the Board to do nothing more than is specifically approved therein, i. e., “ * * * to execute con[217]*217tracts and grant concessions * * *.” The rule that city boards created by statute, charter, or ordinance possess only such powers as expressly granted by law requires no citation of authority. It cannot be argued that the specifically restricted grant of powers in M.C.S. Ordinance No. 680, Section 2, or the “ * * * functions of collecting all revenues * * * ” [from operations, contracts and concessions] delegated by M.C.S. Ordinance 680, Section 8, implies approval by the City Council for the Board to exact the payment of a percentage of gross receipts from providers of non-contractual ground transportation activities. The rule of strict construction is applicable to an ordinance conferring powers on a municipal board. There can be no enlargement by implication of the powers specifically granted. Obviously, it was not within the legislative intendment of the City Council by M.C.S. Ordinance No. 680, Sections 1, 2, or 8, to delegate to the Board the power and authority to exact, within its discretion, an onerous payment or pecuniary burden -in the nature of a tax from defendants for engaging in the business of non-contractual ground transportation services at the Airport.6
Accordingly, since we conclude that M. C.S. Ordinance No. 680 is specifically limited to the approval therein granted to the Board, it is unnecessary, and we do not decide whether Article 14, Section 31.6(D) expressly or impliedly repeals M.C.S. Ordinance No. 680. We simply conclude that the provisions of Article 14, LSA-Const. 1921, Section 31.6(D) are applicable to the Board’s resolution of August 10, 1972.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
317 So. 2d 214, 1975 La. App. LEXIS 3489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-orleans-v-gray-line-motor-tours-inc-lactapp-1975.