City of New Orleans v. Bienvenu

23 La. Ann. 710
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 15, 1871·No. No. 1221·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

I-Iowe, J.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment against him for the amount of a license tax imposed by the city of New Orleans upon him as notary public in and for tbe parish of Orleans.

The judgment was, we think, erroneous. A notary is an officer appointed by the Governor by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and commissioned and sworn as such, and the city of New Orleans has no right, at least in the absence of some express permission, to impose a tax on such an officer in his official character.

A permission to impose a license tax on “trades, occupations and professions,” can not be held to include an authorization to impose a tax on a notary.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed írom De reversed, and the suit dismissed at plaintiff’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of New Orleans v. Bienvenu, 23 La. Ann. 710 (La. 1871).

23 La. Ann. 710 (City of New Orleans v. Bienvenu) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roth v. B & L ENTERPRISES, INC.
420 So. 2d 1094 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1982)
Succession of Michel
225 So. 2d 480 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1969)
In re Watson
15 F. 511 (D. Vermont, 1882)