City of New Orleans v. Arthur Leibe
45 La. Ann. 346
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The claim is for license as a building contractor. The defence is that the party is a carpenter, exempt under Article 206 of the Oonstitution.
On the facts the case can not be distinguished from those of Oity vs. Pohlman and Oity vs. McNally, recently decided, and the same law must be applied, rejecting the exemption claimed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of New Orleans v. Arthur Leibe, 45 La. Ann. 346 (La. 1893).
45 La. Ann. 346 (City of New Orleans v. Arthur Leibe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Crescent City Laundries, Inc.
165 So. 315 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1936)
State v. Tung
163 So. 101 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1935)
White Cleaners & Dyers v. Hughes
7 F. Supp. 1017 (W.D. Louisiana, 1934)
State v. Up-To-Date Shoe Repairing Co.
144 So. 714 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1932)