City of New London v. Zoning Board of Appeals

618 A.2d 528, 224 Conn. 921, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 423
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 22, 1992·No. SC 14662·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 402 (AC 10307), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in allowing the trial court to substitute its judgment for that of the zoning board of appeals, which held that the city of New London’s nonconforming use of its property had been abandoned?

“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in its scope of review of a trial court decision in a zoning appeal by sustaining the trial court decision on an alternative ground, when the trial court itself refused to review the administrative record on the alternate ground?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of New London v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 618 A.2d 528, 224 Conn. 921, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 423 (Colo. 1992).

618 A.2d 528 (City of New London v. Zoning Board of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mr Liquors v. Manchester Pzc, No. Cv02 0812542 S (Oct. 21, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 13852 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Rosenfeld v. Westport P Z, No. Cv 99 0174424 S (Sep. 6, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 11426 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Doyen v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Essex
789 A.2d 478 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2002)
Branford Prtshp. v. Branford P. Z., No. Cv 97 039 81 02 (Oct. 25, 2000)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 13101 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2000)
Borden v. Planning & Zoning Commission
755 A.2d 224 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)
Wittemen v. Redding Zoning Commission, No. 32 68 33 (Jan. 7, 1998)
1998 Conn. Super. Ct. 592 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1998)