City of New Haven v. Town of East Haven
This text of 818 A.2d 741 (City of New Haven v. Town of East Haven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The defendant, the town of East Haven, appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court declaring certain properties owned by the plaintiff, the city of New Haven, located within the defendant’s borders and used in connection with Tweed-New Haven Airport (airport), to be tax exempt pursuant to General Statutes §§ 12-742and 12-81.3The defendant levied taxes [110]*110on the plaintiffs property located within the defendant’s borders after determining that the property had lost its tax exempt status under § 12-74 upon being leased by the plaintiff to the Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority (airport authority).* **4
The defendant claims that the lease between the plaintiff and the airport authority triggered all three the exceptions to tax exemption enumerated in § 12-74. Specifically, the defendant argues that: (1) the lease between the plaintiff and the airport authority evidenced the plaintiffs intent to utilize the airport as source of profit; (2) by virtue of the lease, the defendant does not have the same privileges as the plaintiff with respect to the use of the airport; and (3) the airport authority constitutes a “person, association or private corporation” within the meaning of § 12-74. The defendant also claims that the trial court improperly declined to render a judgment declaring the respective rights, duties and obligations of the parties pursuant to the Tweed-New Haven Airport Authority Act, General Statutes § et seq. 5
[111]*111“Our examination of the record and briefs and our [112]*112consideration of the arguments of the parties persuade [113]*113us that the judgment of the trial court should be [114]*114affirmed. The issues were resolved properly in the trial [115]*115court’s . . . well reasoned memorandum of decision. [116]*116[New Haven v. East Haven, 47 Conn. Sup. 594, 822 A.2d [117]*117376 (2001)]. Because that memorandum of decision [118]*118fully addresses all arguments raised in this appeal, we [119]*119adopt it as a proper statement of the issues and the applicable law concerning those issues. It would serve no useful purpose for us to repeat the discussion contained therein.” (Citation omitted.) Davis v. Freedom of Information Commission, 259 Conn. 45, 55-56, 787 A.2d 530 (2002).
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
818 A.2d 741, 263 Conn. 108, 2003 Conn. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-new-haven-v-town-of-east-haven-conn-2003.