City of New Haven v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

City of New Haven v. Public Utilities Commission

163 Conn. 623

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of New Haven v. Public Utilities Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 165 Conn. 687 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 2, 1972·Published

Opinion

The “Motion to Dismiss Appeal” by the defendants The United Illuminating Company and The Connecticut Light and Power Company from the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County is granted.

John D. Fassett, with whom was Noel E. Hanf, for the appellee (defendant The United Illuminating Company). Walter F. Torrance, Jr., for the appellee (defendant The Connecticut Light and Power Company). Frederick D. Neusner, assistant attorney general, with whom was Richard L. Barger, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (named defendant). George C. Blastings, for the appellant (plaintiff New Haven Redevelopment Agency). Argued May 2 decided May 2, 1972

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The “Motion to Dismiss Appeal” by the defendants The United Illuminating Company and The Connecticut Light and Power Company from the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County is granted.

John D. Fassett, with whom was Noel E. Hanf, for the appellee (defendant The United Illuminating Company). Walter F. Torrance, Jr., for the appellee (defendant The Connecticut Light and Power Company). Frederick D. Neusner, assistant attorney general, with whom was Richard L. Barger, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (named defendant). George C. Blastings, for the appellant (plaintiff New Haven Redevelopment Agency). Argued May 2 decided May 2, 1972

City of New Haven v. Public Utilities Commission, 163 Conn. 623 (Colo. 1972).

Pincite

163 Conn. 623 (City of New Haven v. Public Utilities Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.