City of Natchez v. Lewis

43 So. 471, 90 Miss. 310
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1907·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Calhoon, L,

delivered tlie opinion of the court.

There was a hole in the sidewalk, extending into it twelve inches or more, and slanting downward and outward toward the street several feet. It had been there some months — too long for entertaining the idea that the city had no notice of it. There was no light to expose it to persons at night. Appellee knew of the existence of this hole, but on the particular occasion forgot it. On a night dark and rainy, somewhere about eleven o’clock, she, in company with her stepson, was going home along this sidewalk, and, to avoid the mud, was walking on the outer edge, and fell into it, and was seriously hurt, and got the very moderate verdict of $500 damages.

Legal principles are adaptive to situations. What, are applicable to those walking in the light' may not always be applied to those walking in the dark; and cities, under the circumstances and conditions of the present case, cannot avoid liability from the momentary forgetfulness of persons so using sidewalks which should be free from such traps.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Natchez v. Lewis, 43 So. 471, 90 Miss. 310 (Mich. 1907).

43 So. 471 (City of Natchez v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elias v. New Laurel Radio Station, Inc.
146 So. 2d 558 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1962)
Sea Food Co. v. Alves
77 So. 857 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)
City of Meridian v. Crook
69 So. 182 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1915)
Mayor of Knoxville v. Cain
128 Tenn. 250 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1913)