City of Muscle Shoals v. Davis

406 So. 2d 919, 1981 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1228
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedJuly 15, 1981
DocketCiv. 2716
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 406 So. 2d 919 (City of Muscle Shoals v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Muscle Shoals v. Davis, 406 So. 2d 919, 1981 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1228 (Ala. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

This is a workmen's compensation case involving a heart attack suffered by the employee

A portion of the trial court's findings as recited in its final judgment were as follows:

2. That on said date, while acting in the line and scope of his employment, Plaintiff suffered an accident which arose out of and in the course of said employment with Defendant, namely, a [myocardial] infarction or heart attack. That on the day of said accident the Plaintiff was engaged in the emptying, carrying, loading, unloading and otherwise collecting of garbage while employed by the City of Muscle Shoals, Alabama. Plaintiff's job involved locating garbage at residences in the City of Muscle Shoals, Alabama, emptying the residential garbage into a larger basket capable of holding several cans of garbage, then dragging the larger basket to the garbage truck and lifting it and emptying it into the truck. That at certain times Plaintiff had assistance in lifting and emptying the larger basket of garbage into the garbage truck and at times he had no assistance. That on the day of the accident, the weather was hot with the temperature in excess of eighty-five degrees (85°) F. That on the day of the accident the City had increased the number of houses served on the garbage route on which Plaintiff was working in an effort to redefine the garbage routes in the City due to new equipment

3. That Plaintiff's accident, namely, his heart attack, was caused by Plaintiff's exertion in emptying, carrying, loading, unloading and otherwise collecting garbage while employed by the City of Muscle Shoals, Alabama

. . . *Page 921

6. That the Plaintiff has limited education having completed the eighth (8th) grade. And that based on Plaintiff's education, training and experience, Plaintiff is unsuited for work other than manual labor

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing findings of fact, the Court, therefore, concludes that for and on account of Plaintiff's injury and resulting disability, Plaintiff became totally and permanently disabled from obtaining gainful employment on date of the accident suffered by him and Plaintiff is entitled to receive benefits for permanent total disability as set forth in the Workmen's Compensation Laws of the State of Alabama

In workmen's compensation cases, our review is limited to a determination of whether there is any legal evidence supportive of the finding of fact by the trial court and if the correct law was applied to the facts. City of Tuscaloosa v. Howard,55 Ala. App. 701, 318 So.2d 729 (1975). In that case, the problem of causation in heart attack cases was detailed, and it was emphasized that causation has two distinct parts, legal causation and medical causation, with tests or definitions of both being refined. The basic premise set forth in Howard was stated briefly and simply in Newman Brothers, Inc. v. McDowell, Ala.Civ.App., 354 So.2d 1138 (1977), cert. denied, Ala.,354 So.2d 1142 (1978), as follows:

(1) If in the performance of his job he has to exert or strain himself or is exposed to conditions of risk or hazard and he would not have strained or exerted himself or been exposed to such conditions had he not been performing his job and (2) the exertion or strain or the exposure to the conditions was in fact, a contributing cause to his injury or death, the test whether the job caused the injury or death is satisfied. [Numbers and parentheses added.]

Parenthesis 1 therein states the test for the legal portion of causation and parenthesis 2 the medical part

LEGAL CAUSATION
In the present case, as to the legal aspect of causation, we have reviewed the entire record and find it unnecessary to reiterate the evidence, for it is clear that the learned trial court fairly found the facts pertaining to that aspect and that such facts are sustained by proper evidence. Those facts established legal causation for "It is no answer to contend that he had been doing similar work under similar conditions for many years and the exertion was not unusual, or that he had heart disease. Unusual strain or exertion not ordinary to the job is not required to be shown." Newman Brothers, Inc. vMcDowell, supra at 1141; Reynolds Metals Co. v. Gray, 278 Ala. 309, 178 So.2d 87 (1965). We find no fault with the trial court's findings regarding legal causation

MEDICAL CAUSATION
Mr. Davis's personal physician and a cardiologist, who also treated him, both testified. Portions of their depositions tend to buoy the arguments of the parties either for or against medical causation. However, we are concerned with whether there was any legal evidence which upholds the trial court's judgment in that regard

On June 19, 1978, during very hot weather, the garbage crew worked continuously without any break from 7:00 a.m. until 11:30 a.m., when they took thirty minutes off for lunch Between 12:30 p.m. and 1:00 p.m., the plaintiff, while pulling his basket of garbage, complained of chest pains to a fellow employee. That co-worker finished the plaintiff's immediate work in collecting garbage from houses in that locality, and, when he returned to the garbage truck, Mr. Davis was down on his knees. The plaintiff informed the truck driver of the hurting in his chest, and, after momentarily resting in the cab of the truck, he asked to be carried to the car barn because of the severity of the pain. The truck driver testified that Davis was a little lighter in color than usual and took him to the car barn, where he rested on the back seat of his automobile *Page 922 for a brief time, when his departmental supervisor arrived. The superintendent described him as being pale, complaining of chest pains and with having most large balls of sweat upon his face. The plaintiff was immediately taken to a local hospital where he was admitted and promptly treated by his family physician, who diagnosed the plaintiff's problem as being an acute myocardial infarction, commonly called a heart attack. He was transferred to a Birmingham hospital three days later, where he was treated by a cardiologist and released from the hospital after several days. Mr. Davis suffered another heart attack on July 14, 1978, and his Birmingham heart specialist later implanted in him a permanent pacemaker

The plaintiff testified that he had never had any chest pains until June 19, 1978. At that time he was only twenty-two years of age. It is most unusual for a person that young to suffer a heart attack

His personal physician testified that the plaintiff probably had preexisting conditions, that persons with such conditions are more likely to experience heart attack after exertion than a person without such conditions, that heart conditions are aggravated by extremely heavy exercise, but that he could not testify one way or another with any degree of medical certainty that the plaintiff's job did or did not cause his heart attack

Mr. Davis's cardiologist deposed that the plaintiff had a heart disease known as arteriosclerosis, which is the hardening of the arteries, that "when the stage is set" by such heart disease, it is conceivable that the plaintiff's exertion could have brought on his heart attack; and that the hardening of his arteries combined with the heavy manual labor required by his job, exposed him to more risk of heart attack than existed as to persons doing less physically strenuous work.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Associated Grocers of the South, Inc. v. Goodwin
965 So. 2d 1102 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 2007)
Ex Parte Vongsouvanh
795 So. 2d 625 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2000)
Morgan v. Reynolds Metals Co.
640 So. 2d 967 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1994)
Kelley v. G. UB. MK. Constructors
636 So. 2d 454 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1994)
M & H VALVE CO. v. Carmichael
607 So. 2d 224 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Blue Circle, Inc. v. Williams
579 So. 2d 630 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1991)
Mead Paper Co. v. Brizendine
575 So. 2d 571 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Dodge v. Lee Apparel Co.
567 So. 2d 339 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Gilbreath v. Eastwood Foods, Inc.
575 So. 2d 87 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Blue Bell, Inc. v. Nichols
479 So. 2d 1264 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Middleton v. Dan River, Inc.
617 F. Supp. 1206 (M.D. Alabama, 1985)
Hyster Co. v. Chandler
461 So. 2d 828 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Armstrong v. Lewis & Associates Construction Co.
451 So. 2d 332 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Bankhead Forest Industries, Inc. v. Lovett
423 So. 2d 899 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1982)
Allen v. Metro Contract Services, Inc.
421 So. 2d 1289 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
406 So. 2d 919, 1981 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-muscle-shoals-v-davis-alacivapp-1981.