City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee & Beloit Railroad

7 Wis. 85
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 7 Wis. 85 (City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee & Beloit Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee & Beloit Railroad, 7 Wis. 85 (Wis. 1859).

Opinion

By the Court,

Whiton, C. J.

We shall not discuss many of the points argued by the counsel of the parties in this [99]*99case; because in our opinion the city of Milwaukee, in its corporate capacity, has not such an interest or property in the street and public square across, and along which, the railroad company are building their road, as to authorize it to maintain this action. In the case of Kimball vs. the City of Kenosha (4 Wis., R. 321.) we held that the lot owners, where lots are bounded by a public street, owned the soil to the cen-tre ot the street. This seems to be decisive of the fact that the city has strictly and properly no property in the land occupied by the street. It is true that the complainant alleges that the “fee of said street and public square is vested in said city by dedication irom the owners of the landbut this allegation in the complaint is denied in the answer, so far as it relates to this street in question.

We do not see how it can be possible for the city to become the owner of the fee by dedication. Land may be dedicated to public use, and the public may by the dedication acquire a right to the use; but we are not aware that the fee of land can be vested in any one by that act. Gardner vs. Tisdale et al., (2 Wis. R. 195.) We must therefore reverse the order of the circuit court, and remand the case for further proceedings, according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Langston City v. Gustin
1942 OK 252 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1942)
Thorndike v. Milwaukee Auditorium Co.
126 N.W. 881 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1910)
Myers v. Fear
1908 OK 133 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
City of Madison v. Mayers
40 L.R.A. 635 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1897)
Town of Neshkoro v. Nest
55 N.W. 176 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1893)
Waukesha Hygeia Mineral Spring Co. v. President of Waukesha
53 N.W. 675 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1892)
City of Janesville v. Carpenter
8 L.R.A. 808 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1890)
Town of Jamestown v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern Railroad
34 N.W. 728 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1887)
City of Racine v. Crotsenberg
21 N.W. 520 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1884)
Burbach v. Schweinler
14 N.W. 449 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1882)
Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago Railroad
48 Ind. 178 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)
Town of Sheboygan v. Sheboygan & Fond du Lac Railroad
21 Wis. 667 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1867)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Wis. 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-milwaukee-v-milwaukee-beloit-railroad-wis-1859.