City of Millville v. Everingham
129 A. 921, 101 N.J.L. 566, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 277
This text of 129 A. 921 (City of Millville v. Everingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Millville v. Everingham, 129 A. 921, 101 N.J.L. 566, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 277 (N.J. 1925).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Mone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Maier
99 A.2d 21 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)
Bd. of Health, Weehawken Tp. v. NY Central R. Co.
90 A.2d 729 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
129 A. 921, 101 N.J.L. 566, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-millville-v-everingham-nj-1925.