City of Millville v. Everingham
129 A. 921, 101 N.J.L. 566, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 277
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Mone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Millville v. Everingham, 129 A. 921, 101 N.J.L. 566, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 277 (N.J. 1925).
129 A. 921 (City of Millville v. Everingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Maier
99 A.2d 21 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1953)
Bd. of Health, Weehawken Tp. v. NY Central R. Co.
90 A.2d 729 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)