City of Midland v. Surath
165 N.W.2d 853, 15 Mich. App. 49, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 783
Opinion
Defendants appeal from a jury’s award of compensation for tbe tailing of tbeir property by eminent domain, alleging that tbe award is not witbin tbe range of the evidence.
An examination of tbe record and briefs discloses evidence to support tbe award.
:• Affirmed. Costs to appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Midland v. Surath, 165 N.W.2d 853, 15 Mich. App. 49, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 783 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).
165 N.W.2d 853 (City of Midland v. Surath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Ross
183 N.W.2d 229 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1971)
State v. Williams
182 N.W.2d 396 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1970)
Rolland v. Michigan
320 F. Supp. 1195 (E.D. Michigan, 1970)
People v. Marsh
165 N.W.2d 853 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1969)