City of Midland v. Surath

165 N.W.2d 853, 15 Mich. App. 49, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 783
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 20, 1968
DocketDocket No. 4,295
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 165 N.W.2d 853 (City of Midland v. Surath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Midland v. Surath, 165 N.W.2d 853, 15 Mich. App. 49, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 783 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendants appeal from a jury’s award of compensation for tbe tailing of tbeir property by eminent domain, alleging that tbe award is not witbin tbe range of the evidence.

An examination of tbe record and briefs discloses evidence to support tbe award.

:• Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

R. B. Burns, P. J., and J. H. Gillis and Corkin, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ross
183 N.W.2d 229 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1971)
State v. Williams
182 N.W.2d 396 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1970)
Rolland v. Michigan
320 F. Supp. 1195 (E.D. Michigan, 1970)
People v. Marsh
165 N.W.2d 853 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 N.W.2d 853, 15 Mich. App. 49, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-midland-v-surath-michctapp-1968.