City of Miami v. Wellman
This text of 944 So. 2d 251 (City of Miami v. Wellman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CITY OF MIAMI, Petitioner,
v.
Sidney S. WELLMAN, et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Robert S. Glazier, Jorge L. Fernandez, City Attorney, Maria Joy Chiaro and Warren Bittner, Assistant City Attorneys, Miami, FL, for Petitioner.
Ronald S. Guralnick, Miami, FL for Respondent.
*252 PER CURIAM.
We have for review City of Miami v. Wellman, 875 So.2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), in which the Third District Court of Appeal cited Mulligan v. City of Hollywood, 871 So.2d 249 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), quashed, 934 So.2d 1238 (Fla.2006). By the time the Third District Court of Appeal's Wellman decision became final, Mulligan was pending review in this Court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981).
The petition for review is granted. On the authority of our decision in City of Hollywood v. Mulligan, 934 So.2d 1238 (Fla.2006), the decision under review is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the Third District Court of Appeal for reconsideration upon application of this Court's decision in Mulligan.
It is so ordered.
LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
944 So. 2d 251, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 757, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2592, 2006 WL 3233539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-miami-v-wellman-fla-2006.