City of Miami v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty

District Court of Appeal of Florida

City of Miami v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty

444 So. 2d 571, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11597

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 31, 1984

DocketNo. 83-1987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 444 So. 2d 571 (City of Miami v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Miami v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty, 444 So. 2d 571, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11597 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We treat the motion for summary reversal filed by the appellee, United States Fidelity and Guaranty, as a confession of error and, upon the authority of VanBibber v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, 439 So.2d 880 (Fla.1983); Kaminsky v. Travelers Indemnity Company, 443 So.2d 206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Geller v. Kent Insurance Company, 442 So.2d 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) and Randel v. General Insurance Company, 439 So.2d 986, 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), reverse the order under review and remand the cause to the trial court with directions to reinstate the [572]*572appellee as a party defendant on the appellant’s crossclaim.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We treat the motion for summary reversal filed by the appellee, United States Fidelity and Guaranty, as a confession of error and, upon the authority of VanBibber v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, 439 So.2d 880 (Fla.1983); Kaminsky v. Travelers Indemnity Company, 443 So.2d 206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Geller v. Kent Insurance Company, 442 So.2d 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) and Randel v. General Insurance Company, 439 So.2d 986, 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), reverse the order under review and remand the cause to the trial court with directions to reinstate the [572]*572appellee as a party defendant on the appellant’s crossclaim.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 So. 2d 571, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-miami-v-united-states-fidelity-guaranty-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack