City of Miami v. Ross Ex Rel. Ross

Supreme Court of Florida

City of Miami v. Ross Ex Rel. Ross

24 So. 2d 518, 156 Fla. 805, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 627

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 18, 1946·Published

Opinion

*806 PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from final judgment for the plaintiff in an action for personal injuries. It is contended that the cause should be reversed because of error in the court’s charge on the doctrine of the last clear chance.

We have examined the record and we are convinced that the trial court was warranted in giving the charge complained of. As to whether or not the plaintiff was negligent at all or up to the time of the accident and whether or not defendant did all he could to avoid the accident, the evidence is such that we do not find sufficient reason to reverse the trial court.

His judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*806 PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from final judgment for the plaintiff in an action for personal injuries. It is contended that the cause should be reversed because of error in the court’s charge on the doctrine of the last clear chance.

We have examined the record and we are convinced that the trial court was warranted in giving the charge complained of. As to whether or not the plaintiff was negligent at all or up to the time of the accident and whether or not defendant did all he could to avoid the accident, the evidence is such that we do not find sufficient reason to reverse the trial court.

His judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

CHAPMAN, C. J., TERRELL, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

City of Miami v. Ross Ex Rel. Ross, 24 So. 2d 518, 156 Fla. 805, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 627 (Fla. 1946).

Pincite

24 So. 2d 518 (City of Miami v. Ross Ex Rel. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.