City of Miami v. Rivas
723 So. 2d 393, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 193, 1999 WL 9825
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 13, 1999·No. No. 98-1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find no gross abuse of discretion in the trial court’s reinstatement of the appellee’s case against the City of Miami. Florida policy dictates a strong preference that cases be decided on their merits. See Venero v. Balbuena, 652 So.2d 1271 (Fla. 3d DCA [394]*3941995); Cinkat Transp., Inc. v. Maryland Cas. Co., 596 So.2d 746 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Miami v. Rivas, 723 So. 2d 393, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 193, 1999 WL 9825 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
723 So. 2d 393 (City of Miami v. Rivas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Watkins v. GILBRIDE HELLER & BROWN, PA
754 So. 2d 759 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)