City of Miami v. Plissner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

City of Miami v. Plissner

171 So. 2d 52

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 2, 1965

DocketNo. 64-34

StatusPublished

This text of 171 So. 2d 52 (City of Miami v. Plissner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Miami v. Plissner, 171 So. 2d 52 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellee sought review of a cost judgment rendered in this cause after the mandate of this court had been issued 167 .So.2d 620.

Upon the particular facts existent here, we deny the petition. This is not to say, "however, that under all circumstances a municipality would not be liable as any ■other litigant for those costs incident to an .■appeal and delineated in Rule 5.9, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.

Accordingly, the petition is denied and the judgment for costs affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellee sought review of a cost judgment rendered in this cause after the mandate of this court had been issued 167 .So.2d 620.

Upon the particular facts existent here, we deny the petition. This is not to say, "however, that under all circumstances a municipality would not be liable as any ■other litigant for those costs incident to an .■appeal and delineated in Rule 5.9, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.

Accordingly, the petition is denied and the judgment for costs affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 So. 2d 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-miami-v-plissner-fladistctapp-1965.