City of Miami v. Penley

Miami-Dade County Circuit Court

City of Miami v. Penley

21 Fla. Supp. 170

CourtCircuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County

DecidedAugust 1, 1963

DocketNo. 2; No. 5297

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Fla. Supp. 170 (City of Miami v. Penley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Miami v. Penley, 21 Fla. Supp. 170 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

RAY PEARSON, Circuit Judge.

The appeals of the following City of Miami municipal court cases —

were assigned appeal no. 5297 for the purpose of the appeal of these cases to the circuit court, eleventh Judicial circuit, Dade County.

Opinions were rendered on July 31, 1962 in these cases by the Hon. Milton A. Friedman, Senior Judge, City of Miami municipal court. Having read said opinions and the briefs of counsel filed herein, having heard oral argument in connection with the appeal of these cases to the circuit court, having examined the record herein, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgments appealed from in City of Miami municipal court cases nos. 94719, 94720, 94721, 94722 and 94724 be, and they are hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RAY PEARSON, Circuit Judge.

The appeals of the following City of Miami municipal court cases —

were assigned appeal no. 5297 for the purpose of the appeal of these cases to the circuit court, eleventh Judicial circuit, Dade County.

Opinions were rendered on July 31, 1962 in these cases by the Hon. Milton A. Friedman, Senior Judge, City of Miami municipal court. Having read said opinions and the briefs of counsel filed herein, having heard oral argument in connection with the appeal of these cases to the circuit court, having examined the record herein, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgments appealed from in City of Miami municipal court cases nos. 94719, 94720, 94721, 94722 and 94724 be, and they are hereby affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Fla. Supp. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-miami-v-penley-flacirct11mia-1963.