City of Miami v. Olback, Inc.

133 So. 2d 657
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 23, 1961·No. No. 61-64·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendants who were also cross-claimants in an action for a declaratory decree, appeal a decree declaring that the plaintiff, Olbaclc, Inc., was not liable for the paving of a street even though it is the successor of a subdivider who undertook to pave the street.

The interest of the city is not apparent, inasmuch as the street was paved by the surety upon the bond provided by the sub-divider. The finding of the chancellor that the surety acted as a volunteer because the city had previously waived the requirement for the paving is supported by sufficient evidence in the record to withstand review by an appellate court. E. g., Brenner v. Smullian, Fla.1955, 84 So.2d 44, 49; E. O. Painter Fertilizer Co. v. Foss, 107 Fla. 464, 145 So. 253, 254.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Miami v. Olback, Inc., 133 So. 2d 657 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

133 So. 2d 657 (City of Miami v. Olback, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brenner v. Smullian
84 So. 2d 44 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
E. O. Painter Fertilizer Co. v. Foss
145 So. 253 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)