City of Miami v. Ogle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

City of Miami v. Ogle

600 So. 2d 31, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6992, 1992 WL 123326

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 1992·No. No. 91-1117·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order on appeal for the reasons expressed in our opinion in City of Miami v. Burnett, 596 So.2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Appellee, the claimant below, has filed an amended motion for appellate attorney’s fees. In our discretion we grant the motion. We remand the matter to the judge of compensation claims to determine the amount of attorney’s fees. We note that this is another of the cases involving the City of Miami’s pension offset ordinance and the briefs which have been filed are largely duplicative of other work. We direct the JCC’s attention to that part of our opinion in Burnett which dealt with appellate attorney’s fees.

JOANOS, C.J., and BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order on appeal for the reasons expressed in our opinion in City of Miami v. Burnett, 596 So.2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Appellee, the claimant below, has filed an amended motion for appellate attorney’s fees. In our discretion we grant the motion. We remand the matter to the judge of compensation claims to determine the amount of attorney’s fees. We note that this is another of the cases involving the City of Miami’s pension offset ordinance and the briefs which have been filed are largely duplicative of other work. We direct the JCC’s attention to that part of our opinion in Burnett which dealt with appellate attorney’s fees.

JOANOS, C.J., and BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

City of Miami v. Ogle, 600 So. 2d 31, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6992, 1992 WL 123326 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

600 So. 2d 31 (City of Miami v. Ogle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related