City of Miami v. Miner

169 So. 609, 124 Fla. 684, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1178
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 19, 1936·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been' seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Miami v. Miner, 169 So. 609, 124 Fla. 684, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1178 (Fla. 1936).

169 So. 609 (City of Miami v. Miner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. MacDougal
141 So. 2d 631 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
New Deal Cab Co. v. Meyer
139 So. 2d 189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Boone
85 So. 2d 834 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)