City of Miami v. Mattatall

District Court of Appeal of Florida

City of Miami v. Mattatall

195 So. 2d 613, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5373

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 28, 1967

DocketNo. 66-452

StatusPublished

This text of 195 So. 2d 613 (City of Miami v. Mattatall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Miami v. Mattatall, 195 So. 2d 613, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5373 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

SWANN, Judge.

The City of Miami, Florida appeals from a final judgment for the plaintiffs, Emily and John Mattatall.

The City claims, on appeal, that the verdicts and judgments were the result of sympathy, passion or prejudice, and that the City should have a new trial or remittitur.

The trial lasted two and one-half days; the transcript of testimony comprises 434 pages; sixteen exhibits were in evidence, and there was a sharp divergence and conflict on almost all issues of fact.

We have considered the record on appeal, the briefs and argument and have determined that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error.

The judgments of the trial court are

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI