City of Miami v. Juarez
This text of 981 So. 2d 527 (City of Miami v. Juarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant,
v.
Jose A. JUAREZ and Cristino Nieves, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jorge L. Fernandez, City Attorney, and Warren Bittner, Assistant City Attorney; Robert S. Glazier, for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and John Eddy Morrison, Assistant Public Defender, for appellees.
Before GERSTEN, C.J., and RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ.
ON REMAND
WELLS, J.
This matter is before us for reconsideration upon remand from the Florida Supreme Court. See City of Miami v. Juarez, 875 So.2d 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), vacated, 944 So.2d 249 (Fla.2006). The City of Miami appeals from two virtually identical orders finding the City's vehicle impoundment ordinance unconstitutional. On authority of City of Miami v. Wellman, 976 So.2d 22 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
981 So. 2d 527, 2008 WL 1805762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-miami-v-juarez-fladistctapp-2008.