City of Miami v. East

647 So. 2d 240, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11123, 1994 WL 637297
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1994·No. No. 93-1705·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In Barragan v. City of Miami, 545 So.2d 252 (Fla.1989), the supreme court invalidated a Miami ordinance which authorized the city to reduce disability pension benefits for its retired employees in an amount equal to the retired employees’ workers’ compensation benefits. In the present case, a claimant applied for additional benefits in an amount equal to the offset taken by the city pursuant to the invalid ordinance, for the period before the Barragan decision. The Judge of Compensation Claims awarded these additional benefits and the city appealed to this court. In the interim, however, the supreme court has held that Barragan is to be only prospectively applied. See City of Miami v. Bell, 634 So.2d 163 (Fla.1994). Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND with directions that an order be entered which is consistent with Bell.

KAHN, MICKLE and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Miami v. East, 647 So. 2d 240, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11123, 1994 WL 637297 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

647 So. 2d 240 (City of Miami v. East) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barragan v. City of Miami
545 So. 2d 252 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
City of Miami v. Bell
634 So. 2d 163 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)