City of Miami v. Aparicio

503 So. 2d 966, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 736, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12039
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 10, 1987
DocketNo. 86-1835
StatusPublished

This text of 503 So. 2d 966 (City of Miami v. Aparicio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Miami v. Aparicio, 503 So. 2d 966, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 736, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12039 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final order under review, which denies a motion to vacate an arbitrator’s award entered pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Miami and a firefighters’ union, is affirmed. We reach this result because no showing was made below that the arbitrator exceeded his powers, and, accordingly, the ensuing award was not subject to being vacated, as urged, under Section 682.-13(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1985). We have not overlooked The City of Miami’s contrary arguments, but find them without merit. See John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston, 376 U.S. 543, 84 S.Ct. 909, 11 L.Ed.2d 898 (1964); United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 80 S.Ct. 1347, 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 (1960); Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. v. Gonzalez, 234 So.2d 693, 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston
376 U.S. 543 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Bankers & Shippers Insurance Company v. Gonzalez
234 So. 2d 693 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
503 So. 2d 966, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 736, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-miami-v-aparicio-fladistctapp-1987.