City of Miami v. Aparicio
This text of 503 So. 2d 966 (City of Miami v. Aparicio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The final order under review, which denies a motion to vacate an arbitrator’s award entered pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement between The City of Miami and a firefighters’ union, is affirmed. We reach this result because no showing was made below that the arbitrator exceeded his powers, and, accordingly, the ensuing award was not subject to being vacated, as urged, under Section 682.-13(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1985). We have not overlooked The City of Miami’s contrary arguments, but find them without merit. See John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston, 376 U.S. 543, 84 S.Ct. 909, 11 L.Ed.2d 898 (1964); United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 80 S.Ct. 1347, 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 (1960); Bankers & Shippers Ins. Co. v. Gonzalez, 234 So.2d 693, 695 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
503 So. 2d 966, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 736, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-miami-v-aparicio-fladistctapp-1987.