City of Miami Beach v. Tanner
This text of 186 So. 2d 514 (City of Miami Beach v. Tanner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We have before us for our consideration and determination a petition for a writ of certiorari, directed to the District Court of Appeal, Third District, predicated upon the theory of a conflict in decisions.
After having listened attentively to the arguments of counsel for the respective parties litigant, having studied the briefs filed herein and having carefully considered the opinion filed in this case by the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in explanation of its decision, we have concluded that said decision is not in “direct conflict * * * on the same point of law” with any of the decisions cited by the City of Miami Beach in its petition in support of its theory of conflict in decisions. Consequently the petition for a writ of cer-tiorari should be denied.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 So. 2d 514, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-miami-beach-v-tanner-fla-1966.