City of Miami Beach v. Lapp

District Court of Appeal of Florida

City of Miami Beach v. Lapp

472 So. 2d 543, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1628, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14929

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 2, 1985

DocketNo. 85-1033

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 472 So. 2d 543 (City of Miami Beach v. Lapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Miami Beach v. Lapp, 472 So. 2d 543, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1628, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14929 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order under review is quashed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions (a) to sustain the petitioner City of Miami Beach’s objections to production of the legal memoranda sought by paragraph 6 of the notice to produce inasmuch as said material is privileged under the public records law, § 119.-07(3)(o), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1984), and (b) to examine in camera all other materials sought by the subject notice to produce and to sustain the petitioner City of Miami Beach’s objections thereto if, but only if, the court determines that the materials or portions thereof are privileged under the above-cited public records law because such material “reflects a mental impression, conclusion, litigation strategy, or legal theory” of the City of Miami Beach or its counsel in this litigation. See City of North Miami v. Miami Herald Publishing Co., 468 So.2d 218 (Fla.1985).

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order under review is quashed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions (a) to sustain the petitioner City of Miami Beach’s objections to production of the legal memoranda sought by paragraph 6 of the notice to produce inasmuch as said material is privileged under the public records law, § 119.-07(3)(o), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1984), and (b) to examine in camera all other materials sought by the subject notice to produce and to sustain the petitioner City of Miami Beach’s objections thereto if, but only if, the court determines that the materials or portions thereof are privileged under the above-cited public records law because such material “reflects a mental impression, conclusion, litigation strategy, or legal theory” of the City of Miami Beach or its counsel in this litigation. See City of North Miami v. Miami Herald Publishing Co., 468 So.2d 218 (Fla.1985).

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

472 So. 2d 543, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1628, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-miami-beach-v-lapp-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack