City of McPherson v. Smrha
This text of 396 P.2d 269 (City of McPherson v. Smrha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment made and entered during a pretrial conference. The district court held the Water Appropriation Act of 1945 (G. S. 1949, 82a-701, et seq., as amended) to be in violation of the constitution of the state of Kansas and the fourteenth amendment to the federal constitution.
The same issues of fact and legal questions were before this court in City of Hesston v. Smrha, 184 Kan. 223, 336 P. 2d 428 and City of Hesston v. Smrha, 186 Kan. 477, 351 P. 2d 204. The parties recognize that the opinions and decisions in those cases control the decision in the present case and consent to a reversal of the trial court’s judgment.
The judgment of the trial court is reversed with instructions to proceed in accordance with the views expressed in the above cited cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
396 P.2d 269, 193 Kan. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-mcpherson-v-smrha-kan-1964.