City of Manchester v. Lawton
This text of 382 A.2d 1107 (City of Manchester v. Lawton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[90]*90The city’s petition to abate a nuisance, RSA 47:17 XIY, alleged to have been created by a fire-damaged building was dismissed by the Superior Court (DiClerico, J.) this date on motion on the ground that RSA 155-B.-2 (Supp. 1975) deprived the superior court of its equity jurisdiction over the subject matter-. RSA 498:1. Because of the urgency of the matter, we expedited oral argument and rule that the remedy provided by RSA 155-B:2 (Supp. 1975) provides a supplemental remedy and does not deprive the superior court of its general equity powers. RSA 155-B:14 (Supp. 1975).
The motion to dismiss should not therefore have been granted.
Exceptions sustained; remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
382 A.2d 1107, 118 N.H. 89, 1978 N.H. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-manchester-v-lawton-nh-1978.