City of Madison v. Madison Rys. Co.

Seventh Circuit

City of Madison v. Madison Rys. Co.

114 F.2d 1015, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3264

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 4, 1940

DocketNo. 7169

StatusPublished

This text of 114 F.2d 1015 (City of Madison v. Madison Rys. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Madison v. Madison Rys. Co., 114 F.2d 1015, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3264 (7th Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner prays an appeal from an order entered November 28, 1939, confirming a plan of reorganization in a proceeding under section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207. The debtor is a corporation operating a line of buses in the city of Madison, Wisconsin, and petitioner, the city of Madison, has a liquidated claim against it for $9,417, and an unliquidated claim alleged‘to amount to in excess of $200,000.

Under the provisions of the Chandler Act, relating to bankruptcy (11 U.S.C.A. § 47), leave of the appellate court is necessary for appeal from any order, decree, or judgment involving less than $500. Since the order from which the appeal is here sought does not fall within the scope of that provision, leave of this court is neither necessary nor proper; hence the petition must be, and it is hereby, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner prays an appeal from an order entered November 28, 1939, confirming a plan of reorganization in a proceeding under section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207. The debtor is a corporation operating a line of buses in the city of Madison, Wisconsin, and petitioner, the city of Madison, has a liquidated claim against it for $9,417, and an unliquidated claim alleged‘to amount to in excess of $200,000.

Under the provisions of the Chandler Act, relating to bankruptcy (11 U.S.C.A. § 47), leave of the appellate court is necessary for appeal from any order, decree, or judgment involving less than $500. Since the order from which the appeal is here sought does not fall within the scope of that provision, leave of this court is neither necessary nor proper; hence the petition must be, and it is hereby, denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 F.2d 1015, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-madison-v-madison-rys-co-ca7-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack