City of Madison Heights v. ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY
742 N.W.2d 352, 480 Mich. 1002
This text of 742 N.W.2d 352 (City of Madison Heights v. ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
City of Madison Heights v. ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY, 742 N.W.2d 352, 480 Mich. 1002 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
CITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS and Michigan Municipal Risk Management Authority, as subrogee of City of Madison Heights, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY, Federal Signal Corporation, and Bell Equipment Company, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lewis v. Bridgman Public Schools
742 N.W.2d 352 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
742 N.W.2d 352, 480 Mich. 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-madison-heights-v-elgin-sweeper-company-mich-2007.