City of Mackinac

Sixth Circuit

City of Mackinac

82 F. 999, 27 C.C.A. 677, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2323

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 10, 1896

DocketNo. 315

StatusPublished

This text of 82 F. 999 (City of Mackinac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Mackinac, 82 F. 999, 27 C.C.A. 677, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2323 (6th Cir. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan. John C. Shaw, for appellants Timothy Hurley and another. Wells, Angelí, Boynton & McMillan, for appel-lee claimant of* the City of Mackinac. Discontinued, by consent, after the reversal of the decree dismissing the libel, and before any rehearing was had under the order of October 5, 1890, granting a rehearing. See 73 Fed. 883.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan. John C. Shaw, for appellants Timothy Hurley and another. Wells, Angelí, Boynton & McMillan, for appel-lee claimant of* the City of Mackinac. Discontinued, by consent, after the reversal of the decree dismissing the libel, and before any rehearing was had under the order of October 5, 1890, granting a rehearing. See 73 Fed. 883.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 F. 999, 27 C.C.A. 677, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-mackinac-ca6-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack