Home/Supreme Court/City of Los Angeles v. Woods

City of Los Angeles v. Woods

340 U.S. 908, 71 S. Ct. 294, 95 L. Ed. 657, 1951 U.S. LEXIS 2300
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 2, 1951
DocketNo. 426
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 340 U.S. 908 (City of Los Angeles v. Woods) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Los Angeles v. Woods, 340 U.S. 908, 71 S. Ct. 294, 95 L. Ed. 657, 1951 U.S. LEXIS 2300 (1951).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to the [909]*909District Court with directions to vacate its judgment and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the cause is moot.

Ray L. Cheseboro, Bourke Jones and Charles S. Rhyne for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman and Ed Dupree for Woods; and Hardy K. Maclay, Alexander H. Schullman, David S. Smith, Wallace M. Cohen, Herbert S. Thatcher, Arthur J. Goldberg and M. S. Ryder for Miller et al., respondents. William H. Emerson, Alexander G. Brown, Walter J. Mattison and David M. Proctor filed a brief for the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hessey v. Burden
615 A.2d 562 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1992)
Convention Center Referendum Committee v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
441 A.2d 889 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
340 U.S. 908, 71 S. Ct. 294, 95 L. Ed. 657, 1951 U.S. LEXIS 2300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-los-angeles-v-woods-scotus-1951.