City of Los Angeles v. United States Department of Transportation

179 F.3d 937, 336 U.S. App. D.C. 327, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13637
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of Los Angeles v. United States Department of Transportation. Read the opinion of the Court — 165 F.3d 972
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 18, 1999·No. 98-1071·Published

Opinions

[938]*938PER CURIAM:

ORDER

The petitions for rehearing en banc of the City of Los Angeles, et al. and of the Airports Council International — North America and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of either petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the petitions be denied.

Separate statement filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.

Separate statement filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS, with whom Circuit Judge GINSBURG joins, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.

Chief Judge EDWARDS and Circuit Judges WALD and TATEL did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Los Angeles v. United States Department of Transportation, 179 F.3d 937, 336 U.S. App. D.C. 327, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13637 (D.C. Cir. 1999).

179 F.3d 937 (City of Los Angeles v. United States Department of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related