City of Los Angeles v. Manhart
77 L. Ed. 2d 1310, 103 S. Ct. 2420, 461 U.S. 951, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 282, 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,617, 31 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1408, 4 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1693, 51 U.S.L.W. 3857
Opinion
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case re[952]*952manded for further consideration in light of Hensley v. Eckerhart, ante, p. 424.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Los Angeles v. Manhart, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1310, 103 S. Ct. 2420, 461 U.S. 951, 1983 U.S. LEXIS 282, 31 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 33,617, 31 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1408, 4 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1693, 51 U.S.L.W. 3857 (U.S. 1983).
77 L. Ed. 2d 1310 (City of Los Angeles v. Manhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Szczepanski v. Newcomb Medical Center, Inc.
661 A.2d 1232 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1995)
Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation
796 F.2d 1205 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Rivera v. City of Riverside
763 F.2d 1580 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
William M. Goodson, Cross-Appellant v. City of Atlanta and J.D. Hudson, Cross-Appellees. William M. Goodson v. City of Atlanta and J.D. Hudson
763 F.2d 1381 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)